Here in Reading, Banksy’s been quite the person of the moment over the last few weeks: an image appeared, was ‘vandalised’, partly reproduced and changed again; all eminently ‘grammable and everyone’s had something to say about it.

It’s had me thinking about art and perceptions. It’s a bit like the tree falling in the woods scenario: does it being ‘declared’ a Banksy make the art more socially acceptable or would a hidden, unclaimed Banksy be just as worthwhile? Is it brilliant because it’s a Banksy or would it be brilliant anyway?

I’ve also been thinking about this in the context of runners and their running over the last 12 months. Yes, there have been some races here in the UK, but they’ve been distanced time-trials with spectators discouraged, or ‘virtual’ events on routes near home. Is a personal best just as valid under these conditions? Can a runner celebrate their best ever time if there’s no one there to see it? Does it even count as a pb?

What if your brilliant, the best you can do, doesn’t match with others’ ideas of brilliant? Is it still just as good?

To my mind, we’re all trying our best and, even if my brilliant isn’t quite as good as yours, it’s still the best that I can manage on this day, at this time, in these circumstances.

2 thoughts on “What counts as brilliant?

  1. Totally agree on
    “ we are all trying to do our best even if my best is not as good as yours ….

    On the day it was the best I could / can do and we should all be proud of what we did
    Not moan about what went wrong

    See you tomorrow night

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to Katie Gumbrell Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s